Abstract: To address the subjectivity in weight allocation and the ambiguity of competence orientation in traditional electronic technology experiment performance evaluations, and to meet the “ability to solve complex engineering problems” requirement in the “Engineering Education Accreditation Standards,” this paper constructs a multi-dimensional competence profile evaluation system encompassing engineering experiment operation ability, technical method application ability, complex problem-solving ability, and engineering professional quality, thereby achieving full-process competence evaluation of students. Furthermore, it proposes a combined weighting model based on analytic hierarchy process（AHP）-entropy, utilizing the AHP to quantify the qualitative weights of experimental teaching objectives and the Entropy Weight Method to extract objective information from experimental process data, thereby optimizing the conflict between subjective and objective weights and forming a dynamically balanced combined weight allocation strategy. Taking the grades of students in an experimental class as an example, the combined weighting method is compared with the single evaluation method. The results demonstrate that the grades calculated by the combined weighting method exhibit higher discrimination and are more scientific than those obtained through subjective or objective methods, providing quantitative evidence for the continuous improvement of engineering accreditation in experimental courses.