高校工科类力学实验室教学安全影响因素及应对策略

Safety Influence Factors and Countermeasures for Teaching in Engineering Mechanics Laboratories at Universities

  • 摘要: 为准确评价力学实验室教学安全状态,需先建立有效的安全指标体系。借助文献分析法、结合实验室典型安全问题隐患,构建教学安全指标体系,并采用信效度检验和因子分析进行验证,最后针对较重要指标提出对策建议。研究表明:高校力学实验室教学安全可构建7个二级指标和22个三级指标的指标体系;所有二级指标α信度系数均大于0.7,一致性良好;探索性因子分析发现7个因子累计方差贡献率为71.839%,表示结构合理;验证性因子分析证明模型适配度优秀,组合信度(CR>0.7)、收敛效度(AVE>0.5)和区别效度均满足要求。这表明该指标体系架构合理,为今后高校力学实验室教学安全的评估与研究提供了可靠分析框架。

     

    Abstract: To accurately assess the teaching safety status in mechanics laboratories, it is necessary to first establish an effective safety indicator system. Using literature analysis and considering typical safety hazards in laboratories, a teaching safety indicator system was constructed. Reliability and validity tests, along with factor analysis, were employed for verification, and targeted countermeasures and recommendations were proposed. The study shows that the teaching safety in university mechanics laboratories can be structured with 7 secondary indicators and 22 tertiary indicators. All secondary indicators have an α reliability coefficient greater than 0.7, indicating good consistency. Exploratory factor analysis reveals that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the 7 factors is 71.839%, indicating a reasonable structure. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrates excellent model fit, with composite reliability (CR>0.7), convergent validity (AVE>0.5), and discriminant validity all meeting the required standards. This validates the indicator system as reasonable and well-structured, providing a reliable framework for future assessment and research on safety in university mechanics laboratory teaching.

     

/

返回文章
返回